Prime Minister Theresa May said the "limited and targeted strike" was part of joint action with France and the United States in response to Syria's latest alleged chemical weapons atrocity.
"There is no practicable alternative to the use of force
to degrade and deter the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime,"
May said in a televised statement.
"This is not about intervening in a civil war. It is not about regime change.
"It
is about a limited and targeted strike that does not further escalate
tensions in the region and that does everything possible to prevent
civilian casualties," she said.
May said "a significant body of
information including intelligence" pointed to Syrian government
responsibility for a suspected chemical attack in Douma last Saturday.
She said the strikes would "send a clear signal to anyone else who believes they can use chemical weapons with impunity".
"This
is the first time as prime minister that I have had to take the
decision to commit our armed forces in combat –- and it is not a
decision I have taken lightly.
"I have done so because I judge this action to be in Britain's national interest," she added.
In her comments, May also alluded to a nerve agent attack in Britain last month on a former Russian spy and his daughter.
"We
cannot allow the use of chemical weapons to become normalised -- within
Syria, on the streets of the UK, or anywhere else in our world," she
said.
Britain has blamed Russia for the poisoning -- a charge
vehemently denied by Moscow which has accused London of failing to come
up with evidence for its claims.
- 'Meticulous target planning' -
Britain's
defence ministry said in a statement that four British Tornado jets had
fired Storm Shadow missiles at the base 15 miles (24 kilometres) west
of Homs at 0100 GMT.
The ministry said the facility was "a former missile base... where the regime is assessed to keep chemical weapon precursors".
"Initial
indications are that the precision of the Storm Shadow weapons and
meticulous target planning have resulted in a successful attack," it
said.
"Very careful scientific analysis was applied to determine
where best to target the Storm Shadows to maximise the destruction of
the stockpiled chemicals and to minimise any risks of contamination to
the surrounding area.
"The facility which was struck is located
some distance from any known concentrations of civilian habitation,
reducing yet further any such risk," it added.
May held an
emergency cabinet meeting to discuss possible action on Thursday and
there had been calls for the British parliament to be consulted before
any air strikes.
Parliament is not due to reconvene until Monday, following its Easter recess.
Polls
in recent days have shown public wariness of military intervention in
Syria, with Britain still haunted by its participation in the US-led
invasion of Iraq.
A YouGov poll in The Times conducted this week
found that 43 percent of voters opposed strikes in Syria, with 34
percent unsure and only 22 percent supportive.
- 'Gesture bombing' -
British
lawmakers voted down taking military action against Damascus in 2013,
in what was widely viewed as an assertion of parliamentary sovereignty
on the use of force.
But they backed action in Iraq the following
year, and again in Syria in 2015, strictly limiting strikes to targets
of the Islamic State group.
Britain continues to support the
US-led coalition targeting IS jihadists in Iraq and Syria, and has
conducted more than 1,700 strikes.
Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the
main opposition Labour Party, had on Friday accused the government of
"waiting for instructions" from US President Donald Trump on what to do
over Syria.
"Further UK military intervention in Syria's appalling
multi-sided war risks escalating an already devastating conflict," he
said.
Following the air strikes, there was criticism from some opposition MPs.
Stewart
McDonald of the Scottish National Party said: "The PM has engaged UK
forces in gesture bombing, with no major international consensus and no
long term plan to halt the use of chemical weapons or deliver peace.
"Most worrying, is that she has acted at the behest of presidential tweets and sidelined parliament," he said.
Labour MP Kevin Brennan wrote: "Parliamentary approval should have been sought".
AFP
0 comments:
Post a Comment